Видео

Yes the Russians can control the weather fool using satellites

No way we are alone no fresking way this is huge galaxy human maybe maybe it cant be seen with a human eye ? Maybe hmm infored ? Negative filter no the chemical make of of glass would have to be changed and altered so much to each planets chemical composition maybe then we can see what our neighbors are doing today telescope 🔭🧪🔭 🧬 make of compound of the planet or atmosphere its lens is made of mutant experiments #Humutant #homomutant hmm sapiens? A jungle creature best suit in a jungle environment so id build a starship insulated with plant ☘️☘️☘️ life 🧬 the living ship organic life steel iron minerals soil even chemical composition of space can survive in space with it humidifier water natural water self humidifier seems possible seems very possible

We've spent almost a century to find Dark Matter and Dark Energy but still there's no sign of them. No matter what we do, a thing that doesn't exist cannot be found even if we can justify its existence mathematically. May be it is time to find an Alternative Way to Explain Dark Matter and Dark Energy. 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy

Very Good

etc wrr

Damn really this needed by space x rn

So, if you can get a rocket that returned to Earth with the energy collected ….

How long might a solar panel survive in space? How frequent will we need to shoot rockets into orbit to replace the defect ones (and who will replace them)? And how much energy (and money) will this (and the production of the spare parts) cost and how much GHG produce, and how log will it take for the cheap solar energy from space to return this investment? Concerning the smaller versions: why not combine microwave transmission with those near earth orbits? And I hope nobody really expects any population to be subjected to continuous microwave bombardement from space just to get the energy they could also get from any plant far away through some cable?

We don’t want any of this. Leave life alone stop playing god

What mars needs is a deflector screen. My people can help engineer an equitorial deflector screen for Mars.

Wrong, human.

Maybe the other side of a dark whole is a kugelblitz

If the moon never existed, we would not be here.

the wobble of the stars from all the planets tugging on them from there different orbits proves einsteins curved space push thearies wrong and so does the buldge in the tides linning up with the sun and moon gravity is from mass . dont know why they still keep pushing this nonsense . tesla said everything einstein ever said was wrong .

If we barely see the milkyway with our naked eye imagine another planet closer to the center

If we barely see the milkyway with our naked eye imagine another planet closer to the center

Shut up MEG.

Universe is NOT flat. Dark matter 75% ? Science said there was no ether , now it needs there to be for it's math to work out. Science is so corrupt. Changing its story to suit it at the time. Science is very dependent on weak minded to just follow whatever it says

6-13-2024: it already happened, we are waiting for the light to hit us. Is currently a big deal in the news. Between now and September is the new estimation. FYI

Because Earth is Flat

Hey hank! Have you ever done anything with mattpat? I feel like you 2 would hit it off!

The aether is real. Science will never find a way to measure it because of their narrow mindedness.

sun center we orbit around up outside

sun murcury venus artic earth antartica up

more like down from up top face right?

cold nitrient antartic current up from where?

it earth open end up away opposite artic north into the heating sun mean melting artic summer

antartica

heat expand out

two ways either by moon or frozen ice pulling moisture inward

Planet nibiru will come 😂😂😂😂

In all seriousness, The US will need to be very circumspect and reasonable in aportioning resources to other nations. Obviously US security will always be paramount, but space is big, there's no reason why, under proper supervision lesser nations might not be able to govern areas that do not impinge on American Security.

Thank you for a nicely condensed synopsis on what Dr. Rubin found.

BRO THIS IS MAD

What's that exoplanet where it rains glass sideways?

space isn't a total vacuum, right? are there any stretches of space where light is slow enough that other things can go faster than it?

Anyone started the 3 body problem series too? 😅

Well, that was Newton's interpretation of his observations - and his approximations are ok a lot of the time. But then Einstein gave a more accurate explanation. Mass changes the shape of spacetime - both the space part and the time part. Planets are not moving in ellipses around the sun - they are moving in straight lines through complexly curved spacetime. The sun contains about 99% of the mass in the solar system and if, one day, the sun suddenly vanished, the spacetime it formerly influenced would flatten out. The planets would keep moving in their accustomed straight lines through the altered spacetime and they would leave the flattened region which had formerly been the solar system. Gravity in modern physics is a fundamental interaction, not a force. What we observe results from the interactions between objects with mass and spacetime. Gravity doesn't seem to have a detectable quantum field like the fields of the other three fundamental interactions. This is not intuitive, so it would be much more useful to make a video explaining mass's interactions with spacetime, and how the behavior we think of as gravity emerges from those interactions. And then explain how that supersedes Newtonian physics.

What if we would use Plasma?

502nd to comment.

Why can't I find a video with the earth's moon never existing. It's always if it disappeared. If life did get going without a moon, it would be adapted to such a life, and nocturnal would probably not exist or it would, and the animals would be even more specialized to their environment

The BIGGEST question it’s should. Because it might be some key differences between mars and earth that prohibit the planet from ever holding life on it.

Well for sure sun is closer than we think, many will be surprised if one day we have real image of universe. For now we just hear stories and someone who thinks can see many un scientific theories circulating. I talk about an explosion which created only spheres spinning forever, a perfect balance no planet gets closer or crashes on other. Or mystery of the mistake creating life only on a planet where fish survived long enough on land till had legs growing, elephants and dinosaurs wanted to fly got wings but we pretending to be top of the top we still need to build planes or buy tickets. Or people coming from monkeys and all fish dinosaurs or monkeys evolved, transformed but we still see fish and they die coming on land before any chance to evolve. Only we are unable to evolve, see and accept the truth, we just want to eat, drink and feel good, now we forgot to feel good, just want to be rich fast, sacrifice everything and everyone to save a planet by destroying it or going lower than stone age lifestyle. If we are so great and can save planets if we landed on moon why more than 70 years after nobody went to other planet or back to moon including the amazing AI?

Dogshit clickbait. Then again, what was I expecting from a channel called "SciShow"? Just a bunch of "uhm, akchually!!" Piss off.

Mostly scientists depend on what if to discover thing, but I don't like the at least 13.2 billions because we don't know what beyond CMB then they just concluded thing and they called it theory, hilarious

I didn't get anything. I stayed empty same as when I came. What was the purpose of the video?

There is not and has never been a dark side of the Moon!

I'm new to astronomy, I need to ask a quick question. Will the tides influence the orbit? For example, if we take Object A (Earth) and Object B (Moon). The tidal force of the Object A will cause the Object B to drift away right. Will it also apply to Jupiter's moons? I've seen a comment from another video of orbital resonance that this 'stability' won't last longer on a longer time scale.

So I wasn't imagining it!

Earth doesn't really orbit the sun and Democrats think the Earth is flat.